UPDATE: Felix shelter for cats in Serbia

We have received an update from our dear Danica, President of Felix cat shelter in Serbia

http://novisadcats.blogspot.com/ (at this link you can find pay pal & Bank Account Number)

If you can PLEASE support and spread the voice !

click on the photo to enlarge it

MESSAGE from Danica:
It snowing again today and it sure feels like winter will last forever. I’m more than preoccupied. The ridge beam has a longitudinal crack and if it spreads my snow loaded roof could cave in. The wire mesh is holding up for now because fluffy snow falls through the wire but in December heavy wet snow was piling up on top of it and the wire looked like it sagged under snow load in the middle. What would’ve happened if it had sunk I dare not imagine.When the spring comes I’ll undoubtedly have to replace the entire roof and wire mesh as well. I also think I’ll need a bigger gas tank as my gas central heating consumes much more gas than I expected. The very thought of dealing with workers again sounds intimidating but I must do what needs to be done. It seems that the expenses are never-ending and every kind of help is really needed, welcome and greatly appreciated. 
PAST NEWS:

Just a quick note – Felix cats 

http://legalaction4animalrights.net/2012/02/07/just-a-quick-note-felix-cats/

Care2 News to share

2 Comments

Filed under Non Profit, Serbia

SAVE THE WINDERMERE GEESE

BACKGROUND: Animal Aid

Legendary rock guitarist Brian May has announced his opposition to the proposed cull of Canada geese on Windermere. Dr May, whose organisation Save Me campaigns for better treatment of animals, has spoken out strongly in support of the geese. He says:

‘The proposed cull of Canada Geese in Windermere is the latest in a string of bad decisions to perceived problems relating to wild animals. The current climate of ignorance leads many people in authority, responding to the first complaint about an inconvenience or a loss in income, to reach for the gun. There is no need for me to comment about the multiple trumped-up bits of supposed scientific evidence offered to support this very ill-considered decision. All the justifications offered for the killing have been demolished by Animal Aid’s analysis.

‘This decision needs to be reversed, but not just because of the lack of scientific justification. There is a bigger picture. We have to start realising that all sentient creatures are worthy of respect. Just because a species is judged to be non-native is no justification for slaughtering innocent families of animals. The present population of all creatures in the UK, including humans, is the result of a continuous infiltration and readjustment over thousands of years. Adopting a policy of killing immigrant individuals is unthinkable. It is now time to become responsible in our treatment of all animals, and to see further than our immediate knee-jerk reactions. Every animal has a life. Every creature matters.

‘The order for this cull must be rescinded now, and some proper thought given to what action is needed, if any.’

The Lake District National Park Authority recently announced plans to shoot 200 of the 1000 resident Canada geese on Windermere this year, as it claims that the birds are responsible for polluting the lake with phosphates in their droppings and causing damage through grazing. When asked about the scientific basis for its claims, the Authority admitted: ‘Windermere has had no specific studies regarding the effects of Canada geese on local habitat.’

Much research has been conducted, however, into the source of the phosphate pollution. It has found that fertiliser run-off from local farms, raw sewage (which is pumped into the lake), and detergents and dishwasher tablets from local households are all major contributors.

Read Animal Aid’s analysis of the proposed cull at Windermere (abbreviated version)

 

TAKE ACTION:

The Lake District National Park Authority (LDNPA) has decided to shoot 200 Canada geese during the nesting season. Its reasons are thoroughly unconvincing. There has been a significant public outcry but we need your help to save these geese. For detailed information, please read this fact sheet (an abbreviated version can be found here) and take action today!

 

    • Contact the LDNPA and tell them why you oppose the cull (it’s unethical, unjustifiable, and will not keep numbers down in the long term – find out more from this fact sheet).
    • Contact the local councillors and urge them to stop this cull:

janebarker@lakedistrict.gov.uk
bill.barr@lakedistrict.gov.uk
chris.billinge@lakedistrict.gov.uk
hugh.branney@lakedistrict.gov.uk
jonathan.brook@lakedistrict.gov.uk
sue.brown@lakedistrict.gov.uk
norman.clarkson@lakedistrict.gov.uk
stan.collins@lakedistrict.gov.uk
judith.cooke@lakedistrict.gov.uk
sarah.fletcher@lakedistrict.gov.uk
david.foot@lakedistrict.gov.uk
bryan.gray@lakedistrict.gov.uk
d.anne.hall@lakedistrict.gov.uk
john.hayton@lakedistrict.gov.uk
joe.holliday@lakedistrict.gov.uk
bill.jefferson@lakedistrict.gov.uk
thomas.lowther@lakedistrict.gov.uk
michael.mckinley@lakedistrict.gov.uk
vivienne.rees@lakedistrict.gov.uk
cam.ross@lakedistrict.gov.uk
john.thompson@lakedistrict.gov.uk

 

6 Comments

Filed under UK, Wild animals

Cat rescued from being frozen to the Driveway

February 21, 2012

Discouraging news about cat found frozen to the ground

Donations are needed to help cover the ever-rising costs of Trooper’s medical care.

http://www.examiner.com/animal-advocacy-in-national/discouraging-news-about-cat-found-frozen-to-the-ground ______________________________________________________

Stephenville, Newfoundland, Canada:  On February 11th a cat, since named Trooper, was discovered frozen solid to the ground in a driveway.  He had spent at least 18 hours unable to move or seek warmth or shelter from the cold.  It also appeared he had broken bones and perhaps been hit by a car.  Advocates worked frantically to free Trooper from his icy prison before he literally froze to death, using bucket after bucket of warm water to slowly melt the ice.

Continue reading on Examiner.com Cat rescued from being frozen to the ground – National animal advocacy | Examiner.com 

Advocates at the SCAPA Sanctuary  rescued Trooper and he has been receiving medical treatment for his hypothermia and injuries at the Humber Valley Veterinary Clinic

5 Comments

Filed under Non Profit, USA

Ireland’s Parliament to vote on Ban Hare Coursing Bill

Friend, we have received an action alert from John Fitzgerald, PRO,  ”Campaign for the Abolition Of Cruel Sports”.

Text follow. Please support. Thanks.

Please ask Ireland’s Prime Minister and Deputy Prime Minister to support the Bill and allow a FREE VOTE!
Two members of the Dail (Ireland’s parliament) will shortly be publishing a Bill aimed at banning the cruel practice of live hare coursing in the Republic of Ireland. Deputies Clare Daly and Maureen O’ Sullivan hope to garner enough support from other members of the Dail to secure the passage of the Bill into law.

If they succeed, the horrific blood sport in which hares (better known as Jack Rabbits to North Americans) are used as live bait for greyhounds will become illegal and the long suffering Irish Hare will be protected from this organized cruelty.

In Ireland, up to eighty hare coursing events are held each year. The so-called “sport” is cruel from beginning to end. Wild hares are captured by gangs roaming the countryside with nets. Some hares become injured during capture as a result of entanglement in the nets and these animals are discarded or killed.

A coursing event involves setting pairs of greyhounds after the captured hares within the confines of a wire-enclosed field or race course. Each hare has to run towards an escape hatch at the opposite end of the venue. Though the dogs are muzzled, they can maul the hares, pin them to the ground inflicting injury, or toss them into the air like playthings. Many hares are subjected to painful injury and have to be killed as a result. The injuries include bone breakages that cannot heal and leg parts getting ripped off.

Even hares released from captivity after a coursing event have not escaped the ordeal. Many of these succumb to a condition called Capture Myopathy, a stress-related ailment that may kill them, meaning that they literally “die of fright”, the entire unnatural experience including captivity having proved too much for them.
As if this were not bad enough, hares are also used to “blood” greyhounds. Hares that are ill or injured are routinely fed

LIVE to the dogs to enhance their performance in coursing. The aim is to give greyhounds a thirst for blood and encourage them to run faster in pursuit of the hares at the official coursing events.

Hare coursing is illegal in Scotland, England, and Wales since 2004 and was banned in Northern Ireland in August of last year. The last Australian State to permit it was South Australia, which outlawed the practice in 1985.

We are appealing to anyone who cares about the protection of animals, in the Republic of Ireland, or elsewhere in the world, to send a brief message to the two most powerful politicians in Ireland, the Prime Minister (Taoiseach in Irish), and Deputy Prime Minister (Tanaiste in Irish), asking them to allow a FREE VOTE in parliament on the forthcoming Bill to ban hare coursing and to set an example by supporting the Bill themselves.

It is essential that all members of parliament are allowed to vote in accordance with their consciences or the Bill cannot be passed. Pro hare coursing politicians are pressing for members of parliament to be “whipped” by their respective parties into rejecting the proposed hare coursing ban.

The Prime Minister Enda Kenny and Deputy Prime Minister Eamon Gilmore are also leaders of the two largest political parties in Ireland. They can determine the success or failure of the Bill.

The Bill is expected to be voted upon by July.

Even a very short message will suffice, simply requesting that all members of the Irish parliament will be permitted to support the anti hare coursing Bill if they so wish.

We suggest that you write to, or email Mr. Kenny with a copy of your message to Mr. Gilmore. Their contact details are as follows:

An Taoiseach (Irish Prime Minister) Enda Kenny
Department of the Taoiseach,
Government Buildings,
Upper Merrion Street,
Dublin 2 , Republic of Ireland
Email: taoiseach@taoiseach.gov.ie
An Tanaiste, (Deputy Prime Minister)
Eamon Gilmore
Office of the Tanaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade,
Iveagh House,
80 St. Stephen’s Green,
Dublin 2, Republic of Ireland.
Email: eamon.gilmore@oireachtas.ie

We would appreciate if you would pass this appeal to other like-minded people/animal protection groups.
For anyone unfamiliar with hare coursing as practiced in Ireland, here is a brief film:

Anti Blood Sports Book free to download and available on Kindle:
For further information on the campaign for the abolition of hare coursing in Ireland and the challenges faced by campaigners, you might like to read my book Bad Hare Days. In it I recount the ups and downs of the long struggle to protect the Irish Hare from the barbarity that some humans deem to be “sport”.
The paperback edition of Bad Hare Days is out of print but the book is now available as a free download and is also on Kindle.
It can be downloaded free of cost at any of the following three links:
http://banbloodsports.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/bad-hare-days2.pdf
http://banbloodsports.wordpress.com/2011/11/25/bad-hare-days/
www.tinyurl.com/bhdbook

It can be downloaded on Kindle from the following links:
Amazon UK:
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Bad-Hare-Days-ebook/dp/B0077D1BC4/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1328887255&sr=8-2

Amazon USA:
http://www.amazon.com/Bad-Hare-Days-ebook/dp/B0077D1BC4/ref=sr_1_cc_2?s=aps&ie=UTF8&qid=1328887653&sr=1-2-catcorr

9 Comments

Filed under Blood Sports, Ireland

Cruel Horse-Diving Shows Canceled

Reblogged from Victories for the Animals:

Click to visit the original post

Courtesy of the Library of Congress: LC-USZ62-24057 After worldwide condemnation of a proposed horse diving act in Atlantic City, horse advocates are now celebrating the announcement that there will be no horse diving at Steel Pier this summer. The Editorial Board of the Star-Ledger, New Jersey’s largest newspaper, chimed in to say that “no one wants to buy bathtub hootch or dodge bullets from Al Capone on the Boardwalk today. The horse-diving act belongs in the same ash bin of history. We’re glad the …

6 Comments

Filed under Horses, USA

Leona Lewis Sends Valentine’s Plea to Brussels: Have a Heart for Animals in Cosmetics Testing

 

Valentine's plea from Leona Lewis for governments to "have a heart" for animals in cosmetics testing. Christopher Ameruso

Source: Humane Society International/United Kingdom

Singer Leona Lewis has sent a Valentine’s card and letter to John Dalli, European Commissioner for Health and Consumer Policy, with a personal plea for him to help end the suffering of animals used in cosmetics testing. Leona’s card, sent in support of Humane Society International’s CrueltyFree2013 campaign, features a stunning photo of the ‘Hurt’ singer wearing an End Animal Testing body art message.

The European Union banned animal testing for cosmetics in 2009, yet ingredients can still be tested on animals in other countries and then sold in EU shops. A ban on selling these animal-tested cosmetics is due to come into force in 2013 and would act as a major financial incentive for cosmetic companies to kick their animal testing habit. However, Commissioner Dalli is now considering a proposal that would undermine the ban by giving cosmetics companies a loophole to continue profiting from animal suffering.

Leona wrote:

““Like most girls, I love make-up, but my ethical principles are also very important to me. No new lipstick, eye-liner or other cosmetics ingredient can ever be worth the suffering and death of defenceless animals forced to endure painful toxicity tests. These gentle animals are killed by the hundreds in some tests, despite the fact that manufacturing products free of new animal testing is perfectly possible through the use of thousands of existing, safe ingredients. Animals have suffered enough – if their pain has been deemed immoral within the EU, it must also be immoral outside the EU. To trade in their pain would be hypocrisy.”

In countries such as China, Brazil and the United States, animals such as rabbits, guinea pigs, mice and hamsters are still being force-fed cosmetic products and ingredients, or having them dripped into their eyes or on to their skin. In some cases, animals are chemically overdosed to the point of death, while in others chemicals are fed to pregnant mothers to see the effect on their unborn babies.

Leona Lewis, Ricky Gervais, Dame Judi Dench, Ke$ha, Melanie C, Mary McCartney, Sir Roger Moore, Virginia McKenna and Brigitte Bardot have all signed HSI’s CrueltyFree2013 on-line petition to save the 2013 sales ban. More than 140,000 EU citizens have also signed at www.hsi.org/crueltyfree2013.

 

View a low-resolution image of Leona’s Valentine’s card.

Read Leona’s Valentine’s letter in full.

5 Comments

Filed under Animal experimentation, EU

Victory for Wild Horses in North Carolina

Reblogged from Victories for the Animals:

  • Click to visit the original post

UPDATE from  Animal Welfare Institute (AWI) The Animal Welfare Institute (AWI) commends the House of Representatives for unanimously passing H.R. 306, the Corolla Wild Horses Protection Act, introduced by Representative Walter B. Jones (R-NC). This bill will provide for a new management plan for the free-roaming Corolla wild horses in and around the Currituck National Wildlife Refuge on the Outer Banks of North Carolina. The Animal Welfare Institute (AWI) commends the House of Representatives for …

2 Comments

Filed under Horses, USA

Brazil: All Ready Now for the Official Launch of the Film About Stray Animal Suffering

One of the aims of this documentary is to promote the humane sterilisation of stray animals in order to eventually reduce stray animal numbers.

Visit our friends at SERBIAN ANIMALS VOICE and read full news:

http://serbiananimalsvoice.wordpress.com/2012/02/11/brazil-all-ready-now-for-the-official-launch-of-the-film-about-stray-animal-suffering-and-the-promotion-of-humane-sterilisation-to-reduce-stray-animals-populations/

3 Comments

Filed under Brazil, Documentary

Proposed animal tests for GM food and feed ignore science and are totally unnecessary

UPDATE from Eurogroup for Animals

 

Eurogroup for Animals is extremely disappointed by plans unveiled by the European Commission to introduce obligatory 90-day feeding trials for GMOs in implementing rules due to be discussed with stakeholders today. This proposal goes against the latest scientific advice from the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) published in January this year. This advice states that it should only be carried out on a case-by-case basis as determined by EFSA itself which has so far been the case.

The Implementing Rules for the authorisation of genetically modified food and feed, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, are currently being discussed by Member States representatives. The inclusion of the obligatory test needs to be removed as it has a major impact on animal welfare and suffering and is not based on any sound scientific basis. The Commission should work to promote the use of non-animal alternative tests instead.

“We believe that the obligatory call is in contradiction to the Commission’s objective to reduce, refine and replace animal testing and to replace it with more modern, state-of-the-art science. There is no scientific reasoning behind the decision to make this test obligatory. It is purely political,” saidSonja Van Tichelen, Director of Eurogroup for Animals.

“We are extremely alarmed that despite there being no evidence that this test has ever yielded any additional significant or useful results it has been accepted by the Commission without discussion. We therefore urge Member States to carefully examine the draft regulation submitted by the European Commission and to support rules which keep the current situation, where a request to perform the 90 day study must in each case be based on a scientific opinion by EFSA,” she concluded.

In addition to the unnecessary use of animal testing the Commission ignores the demands of EU citizens which have expressed major concerns regarding the use of GMOs in food. In the 2010 Eurobarometer survey 66 per cent of European citizens said they were concerned about GM food (Eurobarometer 354, 2010).

≈≈≈≈≈≈≈

Eurogroup for Animals represents animal welfare organisations of nearly all EU Member States. Since its launch in 1980, the organisation has succeeded in encouraging the EU to adopt higher legal standards for animal protection. Eurogroup represents public opinion through its membership organisations across the Union, and has both the scientific and technical expertise to provide authoritative advice on issues relating to animal welfare.  For more information about Eurogroup, visit www.eurogroupforanimals.org.

3 Comments

Filed under EU

Case Dismissed Against German Shepherd Dogs Protecting Their Home

Reblogged from Victories for the Animals:

Click to visit the original post

Two German shepherd dogs, Lug and Marley, bit a woman who entered her neighbors home unannounced and while the dogs owner was not at home. The judge had to determine if they were “dangerous dogs” and whether they should be put down. When the animal advocate group Hand4Paws heard of this incident, they started a petition on Change.org. Over 1,800 people signed the petition to spare Lug and Marley, who were only protecting their home. On February 9, 2012, the judge on the case dismissed the “dangerous …

4 Comments

Filed under Dogs and cats, USA

EU: Animal Welfare Strategy 2012-2015 Questions and Answers on the Animal Welfare Strategy 2012-2015

European CommissionQuestions and Answers on the Animal Welfare Strategy 2012-2015

Why a new EU strategy on animal welfare?

Over the years it has become increasingly clear that simply applying the same sector specific rules to animal welfare does not always yield the desired results.

Problems of compliance to sector specific rules pointed to the need to reflect on whether a “one size fits all” approach can lead to better welfare outcomes across the Union. The diversity of farming systems, climatic conditions, land realities in the different Member States have led to considerable difficulties in agreeing on unitary rules and even more difficulties in ensuring their correct implementation.

The end result is an uneven playing field as far as animal welfare conditions are concerned. A level playing field is essential to sustain the economic activity linked to the treatment of animals in the EU. In addition, and more importantly, the real welfare of animals across the Union cannot be guaranteed.

Finally, although the animal welfare agenda has been advanced though specific pieces of legislation, important gaps where no legislation exist remain. A comprehensive approach would help to address the underlying problems.

Who will benefit from the new Strategy?

All of us.

As citizens and consumers we care about animals and want them to be well treated. Consumer surveys indicate that EU consumers are concerned about animal welfare when they buy food. The Animal Welfare Strategy will contribute to the improvement information to consumers, retailers, food services and food processors on animal welfare through the development a transparent tool for claims on animal welfare certification schemes.

Commercial sectors dealing with animals, in particular farmers, will also benefit because the strategy will provide them with tools to better innovate and promote their actions on animal welfare.

Currently, there are few certification schemes specifically addressing animal welfare issues1. The Strategy suggests considering the development of a tool for increasing transparency and adequacy of information to consumers for their purchase choice.

What changes compared to the existing Strategy (2006-2010)?

There are several common elements. A number of previous initiatives need to be reinforced. So, the Commission will:

  • Support Member States and take action to improve compliance with animal welfare rules;
  • Support international cooperation;
  • Provide consumers and the public with appropriate information;
  • Optimise synergies with the Common Agriculture Policy;
  • Investigate on the welfare of certain species like farmed fish, in line with the initiatives laid down in the Commission Aquaculture Strategy and by exploring the possibilities offered in the context of the reform of the Common Fisheries Policy.

However, a number of common problems can not be addressed through the sector specific legislation and need a more comprehensive approach. This is why the Commission will consider the adoption of a general animal welfare legislative framework. It will:

  • Increase transparency of animal welfare claims;
  • Focus requirements on the results for the animals;
  • Improve education for people handling animals.

Who is responsible for what?

The Commission will develop the actions foreseen in the strategy in the forthcoming years. However, a number of actions will need the involvements of stakeholders, Member States and other EU institutions like the European Parliament.

In particular regarding a general animal welfare framework, the Commission will consider a legal proposal but the final adoption of the law will depend on the European Parliament and the Council. Similarly, compliance with EU legislation is primarily under the responsibility of the Member States. The Commission can provide tools to improve their efficiency but can not replace them.

Are any measures against third countries not complying with the rules foreseen?

The competitiveness of EU producers is one of the key objectives of the Commission’s policy on animal welfare. There is no point in improving EU welfare standards if it has the effect of increasing imports from third countries with lower standards.

For this reason, the strategy will emphasize the importance of developing within the EU a flexible system of rules. Simultaneously, EU values towards animals will be promoted abroad. Also, even more is to be done on the international level. Since 2000, the EU has invested increasing resources to develop international standards on animal welfare and supported the relevant work of the World Animal Health Organisation (OIE).

When will foreseen actions be applied?

The strategy is comprised of a list of actions that will come gradually into effect from 2012 to 2015. For example, in 2012 the Commission will set up an implementation plan on the grouping of sows. In 2013, it will publish guidelines on the protection of pigs. Specific studies on the welfare of farmed fish during transport and at slaughter will be completed in the next two years. In 2014 it will consider and possibly prepare a proposal for a general EU animal welfare legislative framework.

To what extend does the Strategy takes into account the 2010 European Parliament resolution?

The strategy includes all key elements suggested by the European Parliament and in particular:

  • focus on better enforcement of the current EU legislation;
  • further actions to ensure fair conditions of competition for EU farmers;
  • the adoption of a general EU animal welfare law;
  • establishing a European Network of Reference Centres for animal welfare;
  • the use of scientifically-validated animal welfare indicators;
  • better communication to consumers on animal welfare claims.
  • consideration on the relevance of sector-specific initiatives, such as for farmed fish, through specific studies on the welfare of fish during transport and at time of killing

Do you plan to introduce compulsory labelling on animal welfare for all animal products?

An EU system of compulsory labelling on animal welfare exists for table eggs. The system for eggs is based on the EU legislation for laying hens defining different production methods (cages, free range, barn, etc.). Such classification of production methods does not exist for other types of animal production in the EU.

The strategy does not plan to extend beyond eggs the compulsory labelling on animal welfare.

Instead, the strategy is oriented towards considering the development of an instrument to better inform consumers and companies on animal welfare friendly products that could be used by both producers and retailers, ensuring a transparency to consumers without overflowing them with information on the label.

What will the Network of reference centres do?

The objective of the network is to use the current research structure of the Member States to improve their financing and their mutual cooperation throughout Europe. It will not duplicate the work done by the Member States or the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA).

The network will also aim at better disseminating research results through assistance, communication and education initiatives. It will not replace the work of the competent authorities but will provide technical assistance in implementing legislation. The network will also help stakeholders in finding concrete and local solutions to difficulties in improving some welfare problems in farms.

Are there plans to legislate on the welfare of dogs and cats?

No, the Commission does not envisage such legislation now, but if deemed necessary it will take specific measures for cats and dogs. Having said this, the Commission envisages, in the framework of the new Strategy, to collect more data and opinions on the issue and consider whether action is necessary.

In November 2010, the Council adopted conclusions where it asked the Commission to consider the question of dogs and cats. The Council pointed out possible problems where the EU could have a say. However, these have to be properly evaluated, since there is no consensus among the Member States on the different actions at EU-level. Some Member States advocate for harmonising certain welfare conditions for the keeping and selling dogs and cats for commercial purposes. There is also some interest in consolidating at EU level current systems of registration and identification of dogs.

See also IP/11/28

1 :http://ec.europa.eu/food/animal/welfare/euro_barometer25_en.pdf

NEW EU ANIMAL WELFARE STRATEGY DISCUSSED AT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

Source: Eurogroup for Animals

7 Feb. 2012 at the extraordinary Animal Welfare Intergroup session held at the European Parliament in Brussels, Commissioner for Health & Consumers John Dalli and Members of the European Parliament Dan Jørgensen and Marit Paulsen, respectively President and Honorary Secretary of the Intergroup, discussed the new EU animal welfare strategy which was unveiled by the European Commission on 19 January 2012.

Eurogroup for Animals welcomes and supports today’s emphasis made by Commissioner John Dalli repeatedly that animal welfare represents an important business opportunity as an increasingly number of European citizens are calling for welfare-friendly products. Commissioner John Dalli also stressed the importance of finding a new EU legislative framework to include animal welfare principles for all animals as a response to the current difficulties in implementing EU animal welfare rules. This will according to him help producers focus on concrete results for the welfare of animals, such as providing changes in production systems, whilst taking into account their specific contexts and by using the most economically suitable means.

Considering the following developments on the new EU animal welfare strategy, the European Parliament will be discussing the strategy on the basis of an own-initiative report by Marit Paulsen MEP (S-ALDE). In January Commissioner Dalli presented the Strategy to the Ministers of Agriculture who are expected to adopt Conclusions in June. Lastly, the Danish Presidency and the Commission are organizing an International conference in Brussels on 29 February – 1 March to present the strategy and in particular discuss market based initiatives to improve animal welfare.

Download Commissioner John Dalli’s speech (57 KB)

PAST NEWS:

New EU Strategy fails to highlight benefits of animal welfare for Animals and People

2 Comments

Filed under EU